Marc-Andrea Huesler vs Andrea Collarini Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Recent second serve success reveals Collarini winning 42.79% of points, compared to Huesler's 47.84%. Does this suggest that Huesler has an edge in second serve points? Yes, it does.
• Examining return game efficiency, Collarini captures 49.44% of opponent's second serve points, whereas Huesler achieves 45.27%. On first serve returns, Collarini leads with 28.99% against Huesler's 22.24%.
• Under pressure, Collarini saves 52.87% of breakpoints while Huesler proves slightly more resilient at 59.09%. Could Huesler’s skill in saving breakpoints make a difference in critical moments? It's quite possible.
• Over the past year, Collarini has won 59.46% of his matches, slightly trailing Huesler who boasts a 63.79% victory rate.
• Collarini excels on clay courts with a 59% win rate, unlike on grass where he is notably weaker at 17%. Huesler's strongest surface is hard court with a 57% win rate.
• Both players predominantly compete in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, yet Huesler’s win rate is higher at 73.17% compared to Collarini’s 57.89%.
• Collarini has faced average-ranked opponents of 338.39, while Huesler competes with a slightly more formidable average rank of 236.62.
• In decisive sets over the last year, Collarini wins 57% of the time, markedly higher than Huesler's 40% success rate.
• Analyzing breakpoint conversion, Collarini capitalizes on 39.31% of opportunities versus Huesler's 31.17%.

Editorial Prediction (May 13, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match presents a scenario where both players display different areas of strength. Huesler exhibits a stronger second serve and greater resilience under pressure, particularly in saving breakpoints. His success rate in recent high-level matches showcases his competitive edge in scenarios against tougher opponents.

Conversely, Collarini demonstrates superior return statistics and a notable advantage in deciding sets, which positions him as a closer competitor in drawn-out matches. The ability to convert breakpoints more effectively could afford him critical opportunities to tip the scales.

Accounting for the statistical variances and surface preferences, while Collarini shines on clay, the prevailing matchup context leans towards Huesler, especially given his superior opponent quality faced and his alacrity in critical match situations. Therefore, Huesler is more likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming match.